Antisemitism UNCOVERED!

CAA's Campaign Against Labour ---- a non-governmental organisation predominantly Tory actively spreading untruths

"Finkler, who did not dream, had a dream. He dreamed that he was punching his father in the stomach. His mother screamed for him to stop. But his father only laughed and shouted. 'Harder!'"  ---- The Finkler Question - Howard Jacobson.

- - -

On April 8th 2018, there was a protest at Labour's Head Quarters in London; several hundred Campaign Against Antisemitism members used their democratic right to express a view to protest about antisemitism.  For a start, in the UK we're fortunate to be able to do this without reprisals or threat to life, alas, this proves how important human values / rights are - yet  I compute the Tories have unquestionably reversed human right legislation since 2010; Brexit being a fundamental factor and key process in undermining human rights; - of the notion they're aiming to rewrite our own values and rights currently at the doors of the European Court of Justice. They're also planning to change the constituency borders to cut down on Labour representative in a future HoC; potentially ridding human rights / democratic representation in parliament. The bigger picture is: May's administration is anti-humanism as we know it in the UK today. And I regretfully proclaim the Jewish community has bought a very sick puppy from the pet shop, if they conclude (which 70% do) a right-wing mantra has their collected interests at heart.  Worth noting that 70% is not a divided community. I referred this fact directly to the Jewish Council: there was no reply; hence, this is unusual because they reply very promptly - inadvertently, alarm bells rang.

Before reporting about 'Campaign Against Antisemitism's' warped ideology, I seeked to research how the landscape over three decades has reinvented itself - and the answer yeilded fruit from the pen of Ruth R Wisse,  herewith a highly influential professor of Yiddish who  has made a career out of inciting criticism in regards to women's liberation being part of neo-Marxism "apparently"; under the noose of Jewish Theological prose. In simple terms: collaborating a faith with 'Corbyn brotherhood and sisterhood.' Wisse without heed expresses neo-Marxism as a gender themed political nuance, and her followers actually engage in her one-dimensional damnations. Condemning her gender's  theories and labeling them as dysfunctional and radical is an oddity in a democracy, shades of fascism smudges the picture of tranquility and freedom; you'll deduce: she announces: "Women's liberation, if not the most extreme then certainly the most influential neo-Marxist movement in America, has done to the American home what communism did to the Russian economy, and most of the ruin is irreversible. By defining relations between men and women in terms of power and competition instead of reciprocity and cooperation, the movement tore apart the most basic and fragile contract in human society, the unit from which all other social institutions draw their strength." 

For the record capitalism rules, who's the neo-Marxists Wisse refers too?   Again, this isn't new, the imagined disease or self-professed trepidation surrounding a new socio-economic dawning, has the most frangible in permanent lockdown / protest; attempting to gain support. Wisse's doomdwelling is a symptom of what manifests directly at the heart of devout deism -- new horizons aren't opportunitism per se but  ill-informed  injustices, malfunctions ---and there's cipher evidence of this archetypal mantra being credible, all of it is rhetorical. Why I was ignored and didn't warrant an answer to why is Labour specifically been targetted with antisemitism smears? Obviously, I wanted to know, I am not the type to sulk off into a social network blackhole never to be seen again. My URL next stop was: 'Campaign Against Antisemitism;' notably, one of a plethora of Jewish web-communities whom decipher what is deemed.... antisemitic. Their Facebook page automatically asks for £100 / 20 / 5 donations  -  indeed, remuneration is normal practice for a 'non-profitable organisation' affiliated with the Tory party. Undoubtedly, 'Campaign Against Antisemitism' members would scorn at my opinion and refute the concept it politically sways in any direction. What proves it is the listings of each political party in the UK and how antisemitic they are; for an online bystander the official stats and generic antisemitic synopsis on party policy there's no big surprises if you just look at the statistics. Problems arise when you know more about the individual cases than what's been reported by 'Campaign Against Antisemitism.' You could blame CAA hasn't updated the detailed cases, or maybe it's a slice of incompetence. I wonder via noticing this behemoth discrepancy will I be labeled as antisemitic / racist.

To cut to the chase I knew of three major high profile 'antisemitic' cases, in regards to Labour party members; namely Ken Livingstone suspended (Mar 2018), Jackie Walker suspended (Sept 2016) and Sir Gerald Kaufman died (Feb 2017). The astounding case about Kaufman's is that he's still on the so-called live cases; the CAA stated: "Despite Mr Corbyn’s reference to the comments being “completely unacceptable” there has been no explanation forthcoming as to why such explicit and public antisemitic statements did not result in any kind of discipline or apology by Mr Kaufman or by the Labour Party."  Obviously Kaufman's death isn't enough for the CAA, they still want an apology from him -- and when Corbyn claimed that the comments were completely unacceptable that really means they were 'acceptable.' Which begs the question what does completely unacceptable mean? I denote it being majorly stronger term than a mandatory, 'sorry' - to put it bluntly, Corbyn found Kaufman's antisemitic views offensive; albeit, it is impossible to discipline a dead person.  Jackie Walker according to CAA is not listed on the Executive Committee, there's been no disciplinary procedure.... apparently; however, Jackie Walker is not a Momentum member any longer, nor a member of the Labour party; this implies two forms of discipline has taketh place, but not in the comprehension of the CAA; neverthless, what curiously grabs me is the CAA's controversial, nebulous end note on Walker's case exposing gargantuan paranoia, as depicted here -- "owing to the conditions of secrecy imposed by Chakrabarti's report.." Really!

There's no clandestine issue in Chakrabarti's report, no not at all, anyone can read the report -- there's merely a statute of limitations of 'formal disciplinary proceeding,' a period of no more than two years. Meaning that CAA cannot dredge up archaic records of Labour parliamentarians as (actual credible data), who're now deceased and add them to their irrelevent, disingenuous data-sharing of 'good, unsatisfactory and bad antisemitic outcomes;' Chakrabarti's report makes sense and highlights relevent antisemitic cases.  Livingstone is still suspended from March 2018, alas, the CAA have conveniently put: 'launching a fresh inquiry, no results so far' on his case file, hence, under CAA rule goes into the bad outcome file - you'll be forgiven if you think this organisation is detached from reality. A campaign purely against Labour, not antisemitism - and the evidence verifies my position by knowing whom is on the Campaign Against Antisemitism' Honary Patron's list for a 'non-governmental' organisation (independent, that's not profit-orientated) . Unsurprisingly, among the patrons handful of Conservative MPs, including Sir Eric Pickles; and one Labour representative Fabian Hamilton who refrained from advertising the antisemtic protests at Labour Head Quarters via social media on April 8th; unlike Sir Eric Pickles who alerted his social media followers to read Howard Jacobson's sobering 'Guardian' article -- which he described Jeremy Corbyn as a master of cold-eyed contempt. It is assumed within leftist politics, that when a Jew complains of antisemitism, he is lying.  When a non-governmental organisation asks active Tories to widen the net to capture antisemitic content, you could argue successfully CAA is heavily affiliated with the Conservative party, thus coincidentally runs this nation, which allegedly crosses over into governmental matters. It's easy to give an example: 

CAA In a pickle

Sir Eric Pickles Retweeted Mike Smithsons post on April 2nd: "Based on last night Corbyn doesn't look as though he's treating LAB's antisemitism crisis seriously." He was busy on April 2nd, six days before CAA's Labour Head Quarter antisemitic protest in London because he Retweeted Alex Wickham's post: "Mr Corbyn was there ref: 'Jewdus' meeting, there in a personal and not a professional capacity and was not working!!!"  How did Wickham know this was the case, was he himself present? I say this duly because it's impossible to conclude a photograph informs the voyeur of 'personal or professional' modes. And as Sir Eric Pickles is a Honary Patron of CAA which conducts itself in an independent, non-profit orientated status, you can absolutely state with assurance the total opposite is happening. The Jewish community are discriminating at will via default, the CAA a leading example; it coincidentally happens at the time of the CAA protest that Lord Sugar posted a tweet showing Jeremy Corbyn and Adolf Hitler sharing a car. Lord Sugar is a member of the House of Lords and a Tory and it doesn't get treated as antisemitic in CAA's deranged 'judicial eyes.'

  

I like the look of CAA's Head of Online Monitoring and Investigations; they have extensive knowledge and experience in organisational strategy, systems, compliance and building processes to support the growth of a volunteer led organisation. The only issue is... no-one knows who this is? No name of face is given, in fact this individual could be, dare I say it fictional.  Furthermore, true to form, Joseph Glasman the Head of Political and Government Investigations for the CAA, implicitly compared Corbyn's leadership of Labour to the rise of Adolf Hitler. He continued in saying the emergence of a populist leadership with a vicious antisemitic following. What is in the bistros today will be in the bierkellers tomorrow— a heinous reference to Nazi rallies in 1930s Germany. And linking Corbyn to the growth of far right antisemitic parties in Europe he said, “The Labour Party is a good way down that road today.” There's only one far-right party in the UK and that's May's administration - time to look closer to home Glasman!©NeroBertrandInstitute2018