Indeed, detail is inconspicuous. The UK’s trade in situ is so fragile I question whether it’s worth the bother in exposing the disinformation, of the notion that the average plebiscite could see the folly directives from Conservative headquarters; true to form the hard-core rarely engage beyond a three word slogan and I plough onwards to unearth macroeconomic bereavement, waiting for the wrath of the indoctrinated.
New age international
agreements by two nations have never been so positively exploited, to serve to
a purpose of continuation protectionist dogma – For trade remains the same
between two competing, globalist nations regardless of the turmoil awaiting the
UK on January 1st 2021. What’s necessary is the act of doing
something productive, even if a decade ago the idea of being triumphant to open
up trade options to Mongolia would be deemed too superfluous and derisory to
report. Now the UK reports it, and has its key personnel under the guise of far
right Kawczynski to unlock the paltry trade foundations to uber-insignificant
nations, resembles calling in an apprentice plumber to fix a dam. High
expectation is on the government to come to a panacea over trade demands
surfacing in the US spirit tariff wars that’ll be too raw, robust and spicy for
a WTO independent nation – especially as the protectionist narrative has always
been free trade for the globe and extra-terrestrials who so happen to be
passing by.
Idiosyncratic, of the
notion of a free trade systematically involves complying with the newly founded
creation in 09/20, called the ‘Internal
Market’ – and to blunt the point further to respect the full regulatory
sovereignty that has no history of compromise and may accidently breach
international trade treaty before the ink has dried on the paper of any deal.
One area of eye-brow raising contention is the 0.7% of GNI (gross national
income) annually to foreign state aid, which was written into UK law during the
Cameron administration in 2015; again another law will be broken to facilitate some
aspect of control to enable flexibility in food regulations to secure impending
deals with the trans-Atlantic alliance, outside the perimeters of the EUBloc27.
So, unquestionably it
seems that the socioeconomic realm has entered into the rogue state forum for HMG - the main problem is, there’s developed
world public relation comprehensions, which judicially require agreements and
treaties to be abided and this has been part of the literature since the dawn
of the twentieth century. Whereby, industries provide rich constructive store
of information on how to instill the very spirit of the age – nationalistic internal markets
do the exact opposite.
In retrospect, the UK
has politically danced with the horned imp and has astonishingly adopted hooves
and in the process thrown any decorum it once had away and did so while smiling
sweetly at artificial wants. It then regimentally barks randomly at the public;
delivering falsehoods successfully – it was Edward Bernays who hypothesized
that group mind could be manipulated via political / commercial propaganda,
known as (fashionable faux pas), this
is a form of seduction technique unknown to the recipient. Convincing women to
smoke was his most famous accomplishments; although doesn’t work the same way with
coordinating international trade relations.
Beliefs have no bearing
on the reality; why there are those who’re unacquainted with credibility to a
point it doesn’t interest them. I exposed this by communicating about the UK/Canadian
non-agreement which was broadcasted recently
to no avail to what you could call Bernay’s ‘philosophy
of futility,’- blatantly HMG are those with their eyes wide shut. For those
wanting detail there’s a seismic pressure point on Canada’s dairy sector which
is trying to marshal a tectonic shift from major trade agreements – [1] CETA,
the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, and [2]
CPTPP; and the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement,
both required Canada to be seriously flexible with access and their dairy
market, basically the EU seals up 7.5% of the Canadian dairy market.
Outrageously, the
UK/Canada ‘trade deal’ is a ‘stop gap’ measure, not a permanent one, 2021 UK/Canada
trade details will be ironed out. This has been clarified by the President of
the Canadian Agri-Food Trade Alliance, Dan Darling - because next year,
activates the long term measures, and it doesn’t apply for the interim
agreement at present. In retrospect, the trans-deal demonstrates the severity
of the unacceptable trade deficit which breaches fair trade in Canada. Much is
the political pressure in the UK, the foundations of the so-called deal would’ve
been put on the back-burner yesteryear – however, the fragility of UK trade
negotiation is so dismal, mendacities overlay the veracity -- meaning that populism
will harm a future FTA when it comes to tariff and non-tariff discourse and
shared values won’t be part of the norm of constructive deal-brokering.
This trans-Atlantic
non-deal is archetypal of defunct one-dimensional trade negotiations by David
Frost’s team; the protectionist traits are prevalent, and it’s synonymous with
claiming to leave the EU’s single market, while continuing with the benefits of
remaining in within the socio-trade mobility operation. Meaning that the
prospects of a trade arrangement will collapse once it gets to the European
Parliament, for all aspects of the IMB is an act of bad faith and fails the ‘good will’ initiative in the Political
Declaration / EUWA (No2) 2019.
Discourse surrounding sovereignty is merely rhetorical, infantile
audacity in the grand scheme of trade agreements finalising details - to what
point does the UK exercise control without ridicule? When already the tautology
of wanting full control is superfluous, the UK orders a preferential treatment
that’ll potentially unravel the EU stronghold of 27 nations, and to the UK’s
detriment – a weaker Europe opens up crevices in other trade agreements in American-Asian
markets. Furthermore, there’s always
other party limitations that a sovereign state usually doesn’t push to the
limit, for the reason it’s outlandishly insulting. Overall, diplomacy is paramount
- albeit, the UK is showing the hallmarks of an incoherent, vacuous state under
the chimera of a philosophizing island mentality and it’ll take generations to restore
at immense cost.
Comments
Post a Comment