Legal advice from a recipient
who has been sued over 3,500 times should never be sniffed at or eye-rolled. Why
Donald Trump’s view that the UK should terminate negotiations with the EU and
embark on an intrinsic judiciary marathon against the EU, triggers a
get-out-clause for the self-inflicted Brexit chaos that’s taken over Westminster. Every MP has overlooked one vital detail….
Every court in a democracy provides outcomes.
Right
from the Brexit get-go, in late June 2016, I gathered there would be a group of
external, independent technocrats tweaking an EU / UK deal on behalf of the UK
administration; to firstly create a coherent platform for the EU and the UK to
comply with and secondly, allow both parties to negotiate effectively, to
finalise / battle out in the interest of all concerned. Thirdly, I expected the
rules and terms to be in sync with triggering Article 50. The White Paper published in July 2018 verifies none of
this happened – therefore enabling Tory politics to deepen the national divide.
We’ve just computed political posturing is a time consuming practice and has no
right to be on centre stage, leaving the UK with a potential cliff. Technocrats
easily would’ve alleviated this occurrence; regretfully due to the internal disorders,
resignations and the far right tour de forces ---- the clouds are darkening and
the prowling lupus is restless. Lifejackets
are obsolete in woods; maybe a makeshift hut will be suffice or better still a
deflection tactic… for example: suing the
EU? By changing the decrepit political platform; you’ll denote the markets
won’t rain on our parade singularly and make the likes of Jacob Rees-Mogg and
Nigel Farage a currency windfall overnight - meh, outcomes dear boy, outcomes.
Legal
action habitually evaluates areas of interest, what initiated the concept of having
EU Referendum; this goes back to David Cameron’s discussions for a new national
deal with the EU. You may recall the EU weren’t able to budge on their philosophy
of an ‘ever closer union’ – the
parliament was also making waves that greater integration equated the European
States to be less flexible; legal
sources also announced it’ll be irreversible too; even for those who’re Pro-EU, the formality and language was
disjointed. I’ll concur this was a divisive approach for a non-sovereign
political experiment to undertake on sovereign States collectively; the formal
style of the EU, by not enabling national parliaments the power to veto EU
legislation is a pathway to potential legal action; it ultimately gave the UK
no choice but to reconsider their EU relationship.
Another
area of interest is the peculiar set-up of the Lisbon Treaty in 1998; in
euphuistic terms the Treaty authorship is beyond myopic --- and bureaucrats
have admitted malpractice, by failing to bind Article 50 under ECJ judiciary. Meaning that March 29th
2019 doesn’t have to be the day the UK formally leaves the EU; delays are
normal procedure, the EU doesn’t work to a determined schedule and the Lisbon
Treaty personifies this attitude. The most infamous episode was in April 2008,
when the then PM Gordon Brown formally signed a belated EU Treaty; the event
was staged for a plethora
of media streams; typical of recent Treaties and to call it shambolic is
accurate. The UK is better placed than the other twenty-seven States to
question the details of Lisbon. Former diplomat Lord Kerr implied that
additional conditions to Article 50 was possible – namely on UK’s Withdrawal
Bill. At present a fixed EU departure
time of 11pm GMT on 29th March 2019 has been confirmed – as the
terms aren’t binding this schedule is invalid. Indirectly, any future ratification
referencing the Withdrawal Bill / Treaty can only be truly agreed on completion
of Brexit negotiations, the Bill expires on January 21st 2019.
What is unknown is what form does Brexit take from
January 22nd 2019? I can hasten a guess a continued compromised has
to be made by the Brexit Team and EU negotiators of the pretext everything what
we’ve known up to that point was derived by comprehending a democratic status –
equating that all options are still on the negotiating table including staying
in the European Union, (if a no-deal
became a reality) if ‘all options’ don’t apply or become ‘non-negotiable’
then the UK wouldn’t be deemed a democracy – dangerous games, that’ll trigger
the UK suing the EU via going through the ECJ – granted, if this in
situ commences, the UK’s EU departure date will become irrelevant. By February
1st 2019, we’ll know the answer to these scenarios; albeit, also expect
litigations against the EU to enforce fiscal passports for the EU trading bloc,
devised to keep our financial service sector solvent.
Positions change rapidly in arbitration for the White Paper is a far cry from what was
promised to the nation voting for independence. Instead the UK is to be a vassallus for the EU – from the outset, internally independent, however
a servant and held an allegiance to a sixteenth century monarch (EU); putting
this into contrast the EU isn’t of a higher sovereign standing than the UK and an
EU expropriation to these shores isn’t imminent. May’s convoluted vision of a vassallus nation sings; ‘save me’ and Trump amiably offered simplistic
legal advice, plainly used as a deflective tactic to exact a… outcome;
something Theresa May is incapable of pioneering herself. There’s a realization
how despicable May is as a leader and a Prime Minster because one five minute conversation
with a misogynist, third-rate President has offered May a lifeline in EU negotiations
– subsequently guaranteeing options. Regretfully there’s a worrisome UK
Post-Brexit model forming, directly indicated by being a so-called ‘vassell
state’ by obliging to pay remunerations to its superior and at a drop of a hat
complying to their future whims, i.e. Federal European Army – effectively the
UK will be taking orders from Brussels to aid the EU27 with military units; not
very Churchillian is it? No wonder Boris Johnson bolted from his cabinet
tenureship.
Adverse economic impacts should be gauged till October,
purely in a bid to sue the EU. Trade outages while the UK is in the EU is
apparent and possible downgraded of future investments can bolster a claim just
as a private corporation can sue their competitors for unfair trading --
another blatant observation would be the Japan / EU trade deal that’s come into
fruition, commenced at an epoch when Brexit tilts off towards a ‘no-deal’ prediction.
Thanks to Trump I can see the European Central Bank bailing out ‘ol Blighty,
ordered by the ECJ on humanity grounds -- notably, our special relationship statuses
are going to be insanely tested.
Comments
Post a Comment