You may’ve heard of the idiom: ‘it’s a dog eat dog world’ --- and it’s accurate if you let the system warp the reality of what you signed up to via contract or agreed to by having a mortgage for example… there’s no such thing as being a victim either, for a start if you activate the law for your benefit, to a point that the corporate world wouldn’t dare to have power over you, they won’t proceed to have power over you, of the knowledge it’s too expensive to implement.
I’ve a hundred percent
success rate at resolving debt issues - period; and it derived by gathering
meticulous details from corporate terms and conditions, consumer rights and
being proficient in data protection (s) and even understanding Human Right (s)
to a value that is incredibly informative for making the ‘prey policy’ obsolete. The ‘Wolf
of Wall Street’ called it the ‘kill,’ you may recall. Anyone can do it. I am not special and despise
bureaucracy this is why I sniff out loopholes and very successful at doing it,
far better than a certified lawyer whom prefer to engage in the status quo for
a quiet life and won’t go out of their way to implement lawful material to help
a client. Not in their interest, unless of course you’re of the ilk of Cliff
Richard (someone of wealth and celeb-status); four years of intrusive evidence,
which a 1 Million (GBP) Pay Out is guaranteed. For the majority we’re not privy
to have the same treatment or extensive loophole search; does this go against
our Human Right? Well, the answer is… yes, but as the idiom says: ‘it’s a dog eat dog world.’ Easy cop out you think, yes, you’re correct to
think this -- and furthermore, you’ll find no authority is happy to give you
the answer wilfully - if you want extra proof… the judicial system has a
get-out-clause, ‘each case is singular /
individual based on the situ.’ This
is abhorrent.
How you can get off paying a bailiff
Peculiar synergy here,
duly of the premise, bailiffs go to your property one hundred percent of the
time to collect debt, surely this is an umbrella’d / collective practice, not a
singular / individual case based on a situ; where then does it change? In
retrospect, the system doesn’t automatically change et al, and this is where
the frailties are in their practices. It won’t get you off paying the debt, but
if you have the initial mind-set, you’re in a better place to mentally visualise
the situation you find yourself in; the juicy stuff comes later. One thing you
cannot do is to physically threaten the bailiff into a state of non-compromise;
however you can legitimately ask them how they got your debt information, whether
the account got paid over to a third party and so forth. Use the term third
party, never the bailiff company name, this enables you to understand what has
taken place; and yes, the bailiff will rapidly realise where this is going. They’ll
use stalling techniques to deflect responsibility of the debt onto your
good-self, incessantly.
At this stage, how the
debt accumulated is irrelevant, the important matter to denote is what’s going
to happen next? For the record, every debt collector ascertains your details by
illegal data sharing practices; thus, inform them of you’re in the knowledge of
major discrepancies undertaken by the consumer credit sector, which inadvertently
breaches all contracts including the Third Party breaches, which is another
breach. In simple measures here are the discrepancies: (1) Handing over your
private information illegally to a Third Party (Debt Collector) and (2) The
Third Party also data sharing via default and therefore illegally providing
that service to that Client on their behalf; again breaches the DPA (2003) /
ECHR agreement. Needn’t be concerned
either if you’ve ticked a box in regards to prohibiting data sharing, it’s
prevalent by law to be in all terms and conditions.
The misconception of a warrant of execution
Misconceptions are in abundance
in what a ‘warrant of execution’
actually does… they’re not the golden ticket to allow bailiffs access to
properties; yet, they’re are used by the bailiff to give the impression they have
the power to enter private property, again, this is profoundly incorrect and can
be used as part of the counter-sue; hence: breaking a code of law under misrepresentation.
Warrant grants are limited and can only be shown when an adult / not child offer
an access to the property, not beforehand... while outside the property. The majority of the
time, bailiffs produce the ‘warrant of execution’ not dissimilar to a police
officer; worth noting that there’s also limits on what a warrant grant can do… they’re not applicable to be used on certain
types of property, ye-s, a loophole in the credit sector forbids certain
properties to be visited. Why it is a good idea to put business HQs instead of
private properties; indirectly means the bailiff has to be invited in by a
staff member. Another, misguidance is the
‘warrant of execution’ is only activated if a bailiff had successfully
managed property access on a previous occasion, for example in discussing a payment
plan.
Advise them gently to
eliminate your details from their database and use the bailiff to send a
message on your behalf back to their client informing them of their illegal
data sharing. Perhaps even get out the terms and conditions of the contract and
circle the DPA discrepancy and give it back to the startled bailiff, saying it
saves me a stamp. Ultimately, if you’re spending too much time on the proverbial
‘merry-go-round’ on the doorstep, don’t be afraid to add a harassment charge to
the impending lawsuit, and ask for their full name and where to send the
correspondence. Bailiffs are very forthcoming with this information as it’s a
means to get you off their back and you can be sure they won’t visit again. The
account goes dead.
Without going into any
individual cases, there’s a very simple question I ask clients who’re
psychologically ingrained into the system, that is: ‘have you ever got a mobile phone contract and received a SMS from an
unknown third-party within forty-eight hours of activating the mobile phone?’ Of course it is friendly and welcomes you to
your own phone; henceforth, automatically breaches terms and conditions. About
90% of those I ask admit their mobile phone provider breached the contract within
two days of signing a contract by receiving an unsolicited SMS connection from
a third or fourth party. This doesn’t just apply to mobile phone provider contracts;
it’s a digital masquerade across the board. Not forgetting Car Park Tickets from Councils;
the registration data is digitally shared without your knowledge, direct from
the DVLA to confirm your identity right to the Council and again sent to Credit
Enforcer; yes, they purchase the data and then that activates a bailiff to unlawfully
have your information so they can visit you with that data, to chase you for Car
Park fines etc.
 |
| GDPR rules - gifts consumers greater powers of implementing data laws against corporations |
The problem is, the
transparency of consumer credit data sharing is so much a
cross-private-public-sector-contagion, it totally misses a vital component in
recognising your personal data protection, and i.e. no DPA protects you. On
these grounds no corporation can verify data sharing didn’t take place.
Miraculously the debt dissolves into a black hole leaving your credit rating
intact; naturally, I am happy to aid all those keen to be rid of the
astronomical 1.5 trillion (GBP) of national debt.
Comments
Post a Comment