Noam Chomsky’s response to
the current governmental impasse as a moral dissident shreds the idiocy we’ve a
functional system, duly for it has always been a waste of time speaking truth
to power. By definition politics spreads irrationality across the spectrum as
if they’re muck-spraying; the problem
is humanity isn’t a field. Parliamentarians are media trained to imagine we’re
crops waiting for nutrients; intellectually, political philosophy is all
devised to warp wills or populist manifestations, at first Brexit wasn’t deemed
too perilous, simulating a flirt with the unknown, now nearing three years on
it’s an altered animal.
The alt right consortium (s) and organized jaunts are ruthless, myopic and illiterate – they’re the henchmen
of distortion and walk on the extreme of angst, tone and irrelevance. No point
in informing them of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn who artfully became the moral titan
of our time, he wrote heartedly on USSR communism and exposed the hidden
histories of the Gulag labour camps and
the integrated system within the hubs of communist philosophy. There’s zero
history or practice in the UK on such thinking, so I question why are the
so-called educated labelling the UK’s Social Movement in this profound manner? Their
reasoning is due to adjudicating irrationally from their own formulaic morality
which is disingenuous at best and contempt of free speech at worst.
Politicians generically
don’t warn the people of inhumane policy or alert groups about the strains of
neurotic disorder trickling down into populist pools of hate, oh no, it’s the
academics our Public intellectuals spearheading the ‘fight’ usually against the
tide of abhorrence. Another maverick of recognising vitriol, beyond convention
is Ariel Dorfman a Chilean who verifies truthful experiences and attempts to
communicate these tortuous realities to individuals who’re frequenting ill
prose - ‘Hate speak.’ I get abuse daily now and it comes under ‘patriotisms’ – Brexit
being the key to validate this tyrannical discourse. Unfortunately, the luddites
don’t care about our industries wellbeing, our complex relations with our
nearest trading partners nor do they compute constitutional law and sovereign
clauses since King Henry VIII.
Ideologically this brings
me neatly onto Great Britain’s wondrous histories. The ones that protect our
civil rights and financial interests not the pessimistic ones that Russia had
to endure, and why the solecism of foreign pasts are outlandish derangement
unfit for intelligent discussion, Without doubt it should be treated as project
fear- for it is all legitimatized out of the fictional belief-system of a milk
and honey Brexit in 2016 --- just like Dorfman did, I am realigning my prose to
suit a narrative that’s akin to the recipient’s interests. There’s failures and
distrust and ultimately this is a fair reflection on Labour’s position in coming
up with a credible plan thereafter January 14 2019. Constitutionally coherent,
that has legs to unite the EU27 on a series of innovative prosperous ventures. At
present it’s a simplistic prototype namely a Custom’s Union – alas, a far
greater grandeur is necessary to capture the Continent’s imagination. In
retrospect, only Corbyn’s Social Movement has the potential to unlock it.
Basically, it is easy to
conclude that the default position for Labour is to support Brexit regardless
of the amount of disillusionment. Courageousness however is another
consideration as the Withdrawal Technicality Draft cul de sac hedges closer. In truth power is haemorrhaging from an
inane incumbency, so what Labour doomsayers state now that Labour MPs could
lose their jobs en mass, will have zero bearing on an enforced General Election.
I’ve had conversations with alt right Tory councillor in Nottingham who’d disenfranchised
themselves from his party’s Brexit Team and was in full combat mode against
Corbyn, even to the point he’d categorically announced Corbyn should’ve taken control and so he’s to
be blamed for every toxic outcome leading up to the end of March 2019 and
possibly thereafter - a total deflection of tenure responsibility.
The same ilk would
complain about the idiocy of political correctness , devised as an ideological weapon
in the course of the extraordinary right-wing assault on the residual
independence of the universities and other institutions – never far away is the
parrot lies of Soviet propaganda, displayed as if it is a new concept. Conservative
parliamentarians fall for this languid orchestration so easily of the notion
no-one wants to time travel backwards and relearn the mistakes that twentieth
century man had to painfully endure. Surely the United Kingdom is better than
that; albeit, I do question collective alt right aptitude.
You’ve got to be
courageous to demonstrate a visionary output now that the sectors are narrowing
and now that our incumbency is thwarting pioneers by systematically
blackmailing the UK into a political power struggle into the eleventh hour. I’ve
tried to grab solace from unlikely quarters and found the door slammed in my
face for being of a particular tribe. Naturally, I’ll continue my quest for answers
even though the nation seems to be on a knife edge of irrational gamesmanship,
whereby the losers aren’t playing the
real game but tweet as if they are.
The wagering is done by authoritarians who won’t be affected by the result,
whatever that’ll be. Sickeningly the political pretence exemplifies a
self-righteousness which is unfit for macro economical consumption; every day
is a reminder of what this entails and what real protectionism is. Regretfully,
our hard-core alt right extremists are using bellicose language of Dunkirk
anecdotes to rifle home an ideology no-one is proficient in. And yes, they’re
too blind to see it.
Comments
Post a Comment