Speaking Truth to Power

Noam Chomsky’s response to the current governmental impasse as a moral dissident shreds the idiocy we’ve a functional system, duly for it has always been a waste of time speaking truth to power. By definition politics spreads irrationality across the spectrum as if they’re muck-spraying; the problem is humanity isn’t a field. Parliamentarians are media trained to imagine we’re crops waiting for nutrients; intellectually, political philosophy is all devised to warp wills or populist manifestations, at first Brexit wasn’t deemed too perilous, simulating a flirt with the unknown, now nearing three years on it’s an altered animal.

The alt right consortium (s) and organized jaunts are ruthless, myopic and illiterate – they’re the henchmen of distortion and walk on the extreme of angst, tone and irrelevance. No point in informing them of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn who artfully became the moral titan of our time, he wrote heartedly on USSR communism and exposed the hidden histories of the Gulag  labour camps and the integrated system within the hubs of communist philosophy. There’s zero history or practice in the UK on such thinking, so I question why are the so-called educated labelling the UK’s Social Movement in this profound manner? Their reasoning is due to adjudicating irrationally from their own formulaic morality which is disingenuous at best and contempt of free speech at worst.

Politicians generically don’t warn the people of inhumane policy or alert groups about the strains of neurotic disorder trickling down into populist pools of hate, oh no, it’s the academics our Public intellectuals spearheading the ‘fight’ usually against the tide of abhorrence. Another maverick of recognising vitriol, beyond convention is Ariel Dorfman a Chilean who verifies truthful experiences and attempts to communicate these tortuous realities to individuals who’re frequenting ill prose - ‘Hate speak.’ I get abuse daily now and it comes under ‘patriotisms’ – Brexit being the key to validate this tyrannical discourse. Unfortunately, the luddites don’t care about our industries wellbeing, our complex relations with our nearest trading partners nor do they compute constitutional law and sovereign clauses since King Henry VIII.

Ideologically this brings me neatly onto Great Britain’s wondrous histories. The ones that protect our civil rights and financial interests not the pessimistic ones that Russia had to endure, and why the solecism of foreign pasts are outlandish derangement unfit for intelligent discussion, Without doubt it should be treated as project fear- for it is all legitimatized out of the fictional belief-system of a milk and honey Brexit in 2016 --- just like Dorfman did, I am realigning my prose to suit a narrative that’s akin to the recipient’s interests. There’s failures and distrust and ultimately this is a fair reflection on Labour’s position in coming up with a credible plan thereafter January 14 2019. Constitutionally coherent, that has legs to unite the EU27 on a series of innovative prosperous ventures. At present it’s a simplistic prototype namely a Custom’s Union – alas, a far greater grandeur is necessary to capture the Continent’s imagination. In retrospect, only Corbyn’s Social Movement has the potential to unlock it.

Basically, it is easy to conclude that the default position for Labour is to support Brexit regardless of the amount of disillusionment. Courageousness however is another consideration as the Withdrawal Technicality Draft cul de sac hedges closer. In truth power is haemorrhaging from an inane incumbency, so what Labour doomsayers state now that Labour MPs could lose their jobs en mass, will have zero bearing on an enforced General Election. I’ve had conversations with alt right Tory councillor in Nottingham who’d disenfranchised themselves from his party’s Brexit Team and was in full combat mode against Corbyn, even to the point he’d categorically announced Corbyn should’ve taken control and so he’s to be blamed for every toxic outcome leading up to the end of March 2019 and possibly thereafter - a total deflection of tenure responsibility. 
  
The same ilk would complain about the idiocy of political correctness , devised as an ideological weapon in the course of the extraordinary right-wing assault on the residual independence of the universities and other institutions – never far away is the parrot lies of Soviet propaganda, displayed as if it is a new concept. Conservative parliamentarians fall for this languid orchestration so easily of the notion no-one wants to time travel backwards and relearn the mistakes that twentieth century man had to painfully endure. Surely the United Kingdom is better than that; albeit, I do question collective alt right aptitude.

You’ve got to be courageous to demonstrate a visionary output now that the sectors are narrowing and now that our incumbency is thwarting pioneers by systematically blackmailing the UK into a political power struggle into the eleventh hour. I’ve tried to grab solace from unlikely quarters and found the door slammed in my face for being of a particular tribe. Naturally, I’ll continue my quest for answers even though the nation seems to be on a knife edge of irrational gamesmanship, whereby the losers aren’t playing the real game but tweet as if they are. The wagering is done by authoritarians who won’t be affected by the result, whatever that’ll be. Sickeningly the political pretence exemplifies a self-righteousness which is unfit for macro economical consumption; every day is a reminder of what this entails and what real protectionism is. Regretfully, our hard-core alt right extremists are using bellicose language of Dunkirk anecdotes to rifle home an ideology no-one is proficient in. And yes, they’re too blind to see it.

Proposals of workers’ rights are in question; potentially, diminished under this May regime and this goes hand in hand with our freedoms. Next, speech and just when the new millennials had found their voice over the inane white noise of Brexit soundbites. If Descartes could sum this all up….  He’d neatly adopt the view that if you eliminate the so-called necromancy properties, and you’ll emerge with the answer, ‘computational theories of mind.’  Theoretically, politics become superfluous, and then a string of survival priorities become apparent, furthermore, a deeper and meaningful humanity gathers pace, this is undoubtedly a far more refreshing outlook than abhorrent, mouth-y protectionism. 

Comments