Legal
posts are left unfilled, regulatory checks are woeful and mainframe systems have
a despicable record of outages. Terrorism Legislation is unmanned and yet Centrists are calling for a State of
emergency if Labour wins power. Confusion is plaguing governmental legal
advisers as decisions are based on short gain political whims not
constitutional law. Now if Lord Anderson QC was still at the helm, all could be
stabilised, alas the rest of the legal profession looks on in disbelief at the
disenfranchisement of Begum’s UK citizenship by the Home Office.
Too
easy to conflate vitriol feeling and citizens’ rights in regards to the Begum
case; hence, you do so at your own legal peril, duly of the premise dual
national citizenship with Bangladesh is a long shot and offers grievous
implication if a stateless individual remains stateless. Under the ‘right
to abode’ Ms Begum is British as clinically described in the Immigration Act (1971). Her return is on
paper a strong possibility, although there’s irregularity in who / when
radicalization took place, when peer group pressure via Begum’s schoolmates
there’s a question-mark on who / what is responsible --- school possibly. At
this conjuncture, you can rule out Bangladesh in this instance; albeit, as she
was a Daesh Bride to a Dutch Jihadist, so Dutch authorities could be indirectly
responsible and play a vital role in this legal minefield.
Forensic
platform research is imperative to unravel the influences and failures of our
Free State’s ‘ignorance’ over English-speaking Salafi agitators working in the
West: notably a tradition that’s durable and is ramified more than what people
believe. The late Samir Khan, who was a Pakistani-American, was an editor of Awlaki’s
magazine called: ‘Inspire;’ an online
publication openly reporting on cheap print-cartridge bombs from Yemen destined
for our shores – akin to homemade kits that have developed in
sophistication. Begum could provide
highly sensitive informative about rituals, martyrdom tactics, bomb preparation
and indoctrination techniques and so-forth if she’s able to have British
citizenship. Overall, a valid compromise, I’d say.
Those
who’ve studied the convoluted Islamic laws denote incorrectly that tolerance
equates to an identity weakness and now the far-Right uproar is all clear to
see in regards to irrational decision-making and it’s all for nefarious political
gain. The sooner UK’s Home Office respects human rights the more stable we’ll
be and feel; remarkably since 2016 British Expats and standardised human rights
are hemorrhaging alarmingly. Begum’s case profoundly could put in the public
domain how fragmented individual rights have evolved for all British citizens
alike. There’s liability towards national intelligence, for their failing is
monumental not just for a family but for future terrorist strikes, ultimately,
the system is in the dark about numbers of indoctrinated Jihadists, of course
an embarrassing sideshow of a futile system. What’s transpired is unimaginable
injustice from the Ministry of Justice / Security Service (s) all the way to
the Home Office.
Goethe
often delved into authoritarianism only to find frustration; an area of
contention is to our own citizens, mainly the young ones that fall by the
wayside – a virtue signal for disorder, triggering a domino effect and nearly
always to our humanistic detriment. Under the Nationality Act (1981), non-criminality isn’t part of revoking
national citizenship decided by the Secretary of State. Section (2b) the
government just has to be satisfied that the deprivation is conducive to the
public good; duly of the view the individual’s citizenship status is seriously
prejudicial to the interests of the UK and overseas territory. Only the teenager’s nonchalant attitude
towards severed heads in bins offers an indication of national concern -- a
sign of ‘death cult’ acclimatizing perhaps over a duration; hard to decipher,
especially as our survival mode goes
into overdrive while in hostile, inhumane environments. To come to a British
citizenship assessment purely on these geo-political variables is a prejudiced
outlook.
Egregiously
there’s a prejudgment proclivity within the UK system against cases of the ilk
of Begum, regardless how UK’s authoritarians dress it up, or come to a panacea.
Let me explain, the echelon of governance and their members have read ‘Islamophobia’
material – right from the off, Conservative Membership send new members a free
copy of Michael Gove’s book: ‘Celsius 7/7’
(2006). What’s the purpose of that? But you rapidly denote a bigger fiasco
has emerged beneath the veil of an ‘all
equal society.’ Gove’s warped nationalistic vision is outlandishly
provocative, the parable styled script claims: ‘we need to discover and repro-claim faith in common values. Build an
inconclusive model of British citizenship in which divisive separatists are challenged
and rejected.’
Summing Up
Begum
was likely a casualty of terrorist detumescers, derived from Western
phallocracy of some retro-Standard of Belief. Seductively leading the ‘Believer’
victim into an ideological Eden; only history will ensue whether Islamic
fundamentalism of what we’ve experienced will perish via its own doctrine;
albeit, duplicity is inevitable. No sentence adjudicator can decide ‘belief grooming’ by Daesh did entail
inhumane criminality by her own action. Odious to assume Orwellian thought crimes
are legally binding, alas, where has the line been crossed? Unfortunately, the
result however it’s played out herewith is destined to be a ‘rubber stamp seal’
(example) set by an irrational political thinking synonymous with importunate protectionism
in toe – making the Begum saga inconclusive and incoherent for a durable
period.
Comments
Post a Comment