There’s
acknowledgment that the Ministry of
Justice in Spain has endeavoured to be familiarly cohesive, it comes from
the judicial directives from UK of yesteryear – they call it a legal mechanism
to guarantee the right to receive trustworthy information.
Yes, it's quite a bold move,
to extinguish falsehoods, cult idols and domestic hatred - good news as it
coincides with Twitter putting a note
to The White House readership, warning The President’s follower-ship of
excessive terms against humanity - yes, we’re all in this kindergarten bubble
and teacher has got her knitting needle out. If only such office of authority
could oversee legal mechanisms in Blighty and not provide contradictory
conclusions – the level of governance complacency is startling and it sits at
the heart of the Political Declaration mandate agreed with the EU and UK in 10/19.
In retrospect, the
correspondence of Michel Barnier to the European
Commission in Brussels on 25/05/20 exacted their plan regardless of the
extension issue, reassuring the EU27 they’ll do their utmost to reach an
ambitious and balance partnership with the UK along the lines approved. This is
quite a revelation duly as the Barnier hand has been revealed in how trade
talks will manifest under the terms of the Political Declaration, many of
political-gurus would ascertain that Barnier is referencing the framework of
future relations to commence in 02/20 not the actual maneuverings of trade
during the transitional period.
Long gone are the
honesty and integrity that accompany hot or cold virtues - herewith, in the UK
the disease of indifference is the currency and this contagion is consistent with
Meyers’s Orwell biography; ‘Wintry
Conscience of a Generation’ – which understands the condition of
demoralising effects and the century old freezing point; totally ignoring the
versatile capability in EU’s core philosophy and that, the European Union is
proficient in trade deals with nations and yet UK has already got a history in
folding on negotiating positions, namely 03/19 and 10/19. Hardly a credible
balance of power, let alone a comprehension of what’s required for a Free Trade
Agreement; if there was a morsel prospect in feathering a cap, it’ll be feathered
by now.
According to Shanker
Singham the CEO of Competere the EU27
are anxious for an extension for trade negotiation in a view that the current
timeline is ‘unfavourable to the UK’
– if the UK buy into this deception
it’ll be a trap and a position the UK will struggle with, even though all
parties want a Free Trade Agreement. Alas, Barnier didn’t refer to the future deal
in his correspondence to the EU27 in May 2020; because the main priority is adhering
to the Political Declaration, which portrays a Machiavellian approach; far beyond
strategics and negotiating and it’s been snubbed by the UK media. Inadvertently,
transcends into an area I’ve known about for quite a while, since the Mandate’s
conception, both parties have to adhere to and recognise: [1] ‘Good will’ initiation measure in the
Political Declaration Mandate and [2] the recently passed (WAB) ‘Immigration Bill 2020.’ Equating to an international trade stalemate,
that’ll hinder the UK on the global stage indefinitely - overtly, this leads me
to conclude that Singham’s ‘Competere’ is
currently dispensable for there’s no trade law (s) to reconfigure in reality;
instead political machinations suffice which has no bearing with EU / UK trade
whatsoever.
What’s transgressed
is the future points-based immigration system, the first step into delivering a
non-specific system without detail or basis in regards to requirements to come
to the UK as a worker, student or family member. In the EUWA (2018) rights
ensure capable exercise of the power of clause [5] notably, the principle of the supremacy of EU Law ---
altogether, ceases to be
recognised and available in domestic law, until after the transitional period
12/20. Any laws passed, before the lapsed transitional period time-frame; namely
‘Immigration Bill 2020’ concerning EU citizens’ rights (being treated as non-EEA
citizens) broadly speaking this is inconsistent with the EUWA (2018).
Another area of
suspect in the Withdrawal Agreement is under Article 12 Non-discrimination:
acting without prejudice to any special provision on grounds of nationality
along the lines of Article 18 (TFEU) A Treaty Functioning of the European Union
made active on 5/08, Article 18 clarifies the two party trading formality, although
negotiation (could possibly) terminate when a discrimination on grounds of
nationality via any partner aligned to UK nationals in the EU and EU citizens
in the UK is blatant.
The breach of the PD
Mandate, was instigated through the EUSS, this was made active 03/19 the same
month the original TP was scheduled to run to embark on EU/UK trade relations –
worth validating, there was no delay till 12/20 and EEA citizens were treated
differently to UK citizens residing in the United Kingdom. Again, the EUSS deployment
not only overrides the EUWA (2018) requirement of human rights to be observed it
dissolves the basis of cooperation our core values and rights / shared values. In
spirit, shared values have evaporated, notably all available to be read in Part
[1] of the Political Declaration’s initial provisions.
Furthermore, the main principle of
freedom of movement has ended, meaning free movement in the UK’s immigration
bill engineers a substantial change across the statute book in both primary and
secondary legislation, the idea a FTA will commence thereafter is a derangement
in terms. At present, amendments will have to be introduced to the EUWA 2018 to
keep the safety net of trade formality open. But all EU / UK Think Tanks know
the poison too well in the veins of UK protectionism; indeed, the signs remain the
same, even after the drop in currency valuation of the pound (GBP) in recent
years, talks of an extension isn’t an option; alas, the clock is ticking.
In retrospect, the UK is immobile
replicating Melville’s ‘Moby-Dick’ marooned
on a beach, and claiming it’s all part of the plan, and the chances of this
static strategy folding in the autumn is a dead cert. Regretfully, the UK
benefited through the Emergency Support Instrument in recent months at the apex
of the corona virus PPE shortage; ironically this was part of what the UK
committed to in the 2018 Mandate, notably in the European Development Fund, see Article 148. Considering the UK
are refuting the ESI bill the EU can deem this to be yet another breach of the
WAB / PD Mandate. This is an unimaginable travesty of what was a great nation
which was a beacon of international law, human rights and working standards. Now
we’re wide open for a plethora of international litigation.
Comments
Post a Comment