Worth noting, whatever subconscious body-language category you fall in, the the advice I'm offering here will improve your relationship with money forever. But first you have to abide with this oath and say it out loud.
"Money is your friend, money is an object, money only gifts you choices, coinage has no voices. Money doesn't care about you, therefore you must not care about its wellbeing either. Money is the route to all evil they say... no Mankind is the route to all evil... No monetary note has made you do anything... only you and yourself... craves that bling. Finding is not keepers, neither should it give you the jeepers. Amounts warrants to a mild thought, even the amount of nought. Money is not present to control you... thus, devised via a capitalistic system to own more than a few. Once you know this is the case, run to a homeless person and give them an embrace. You'll see money doesn't divide us, and that note in your pocket makes no fuss." Don't cower from this dogmatic oath, it's no different to other oaths that is said in court prior to giving evidence: instead accept the oath as a reality-check. Now, enjoy the main course.
Ye-h anyone can be a Wealth Manager, you may have heard of the vocation from a quick skim in the Financial Times; the main component of being a Wealth Manager is liking money. If you don't like money consider yourself unique and alert the clone police that you've no interest in finance they will spare your future family members in the 22nd Century; when artificial intelligence will be your boss and human rights a distant subheading in archive vaults. There's nothing to worry about... Wealth Managers will always reign supreme. The raconteur Philippe Courroyye stipulates the money-machine and its future succinctly by producing fiscal pathways and deducing profitable means by firstly, and purposefully getting caught by the authorities, basically Courroyye is the pioneer for valuating fraudulent behaviour, why followers don't need to in 2018. To understand a particular necessity of 'honest fraud,' mistakes have to be computed initially. Fortunately today's Wealth Managers are clean as a whistle, thanks to Courroyye's pioneering exploits, when he faced charges of 'illegally squirrelling data and claimed it to be of a personal nature, meaning 'monetary benefits;'' naughty, this automatically alerted the fiscal authorities to the correct clause confidentiality violation.
What got Courroyye off the hook nine years ago was the introduction of other Wealth Managers, call it a network, according to the FOI another body of interest namely Mr. Squarcini deflected intrigue and after many years and great manpower the complex case of confidential violation stalled, instead the authorities renamed the whole situation as espionage, vouching a nebulous label, especially when the initial clause phrasing and (Clause Phrasing is vital) was 'Confidential Violation.' This ultimately left a legal-loophole by investigators and tax authorities for today's wealth creators to multiply in numbers and develop convoluted financial webs, enabling imperialism to run remarkably smoothly... too fluently, for those privileged, (in truth "anyone") i.e. Wealth Creators, under a deregulated system. Since Squarcini deflected the authority intrigue... fiscal measures / safeguards have dried up, Frédéric Péchenards, who was allegedly Squarcini's confidente was not formally charged. Why networks definitively survive via a code of practice that protects financial webs; then again, this doesn't mean that a consumer can't flag up wrongdoings and benefit substantially in doing so. To see this directly in fruition - watch a 'Vanquis' advert; there's no APR small print... and at 39.9%! Leaving Credit Agency Regulation In Tatters. I innocently asked a 'Vanquis' senior representative how they came up with a 39.9%? No credible answer, however their myopic tone identified deficient respect to fiscal regulators.
To take advantage of ineffective fiscal system (s) you'll have to keep up to date obsessively with the level of UK's deregulation on fiscal orientated businesses. Up to 2021 the trend implies that government is paying no attention on fiscal regulatory measures, due to the LIBOR indicator signalling a phasing out of London's Interbank Offered Rate which has successfully clawed back billions of GBP from offending banks from the aftermath of the financial crash in 2008. The reason is, by letting the financial sector fly unheeded it'll creator immense wealth equating to greater returns for the UK treasury. For those on the money, literary.... there's a worrying trend that payday loan sharks can swim underwater practically undetected from the public psyche, this is more damaging than the phasing out of LIBOR. Why those who've been unfortunate enough to be bitten by a shark have to systematically disrespect the so-called small print of the signed contract. One means of doing this is to directly disenfranchise the business ethic of Credit Card businesses and unregulatory loans, by whistleblowing them illegal. And this is simple: although not widely known, for it potentially breaks down the actualities of capitalism.
Banks by definition are financial institutions *licensed* to receive deposits and make loans. Not sure if the penny has dropped yet, alas, every loan shark (those who don't comply to LIBOR rules) not recognise themselves as a bank... although, from the public perspective and this is paramount - they do exactly the same thing; albeit illegally. Call this the next PPI Scandal, of course it's far bigger and will unearth some unsavoury realities in regards to capitalism ---- Sofar, this has gone under the consumer psyche radar and has so since the commencing of the digital modern era. Basically, by unravelling the illegalities of 'Vanquis' who claim aren't a bank yet under the terminology / arm of a bank, work just like a bank. Unequivocably, compromises their position in setting APR (s); under LIBOR till 2021, albeit; the loopholes are closing in on the consumer, 'Vanquis' and their ilk are extracting cash from consumers fraudulently. What derails their position is the de facto of working via the umbrella of *unauthorised* banking, under judicial scrutiny. One of the joys of being a Wealth Manager is selling out on preferential fiscal practices, and informing adhoc corporate policies imaginatively designed to gain a market advantage over their competitors is off-the-wall mindblowing and to gain a princely sum is to get myopic business owners to sue you... they see one Wealth Manager as easy prey........ and I can assure you after a thirty minute conversation with their lawyers, you'll come to a monetary arrangement.
On a personal front my fun started when I successfully investigated a Italian furniture business syndicate in the North of England and found the outfit was duping Italian restaurant owners of many thousands of pounds of VAT payments. In a nutshell, the main holding company wasn't VAT registered. A mistake done by a novice thus had legal teams fighting against my findings. An out of court settlement went through and the CEO spared a five year jail sentence. A lesson learn't but you'll find that balance sheets and ego overrides small print. Juggling do's and don't assumptions don't enter the fold, a prime example is Liliane Bettencourt's finances during the mid noughties whereby private Wealth Managers cradled their new found power in foraging for finance for high worth investors; again once the foundation was laid; there's workable opportunities including stock-option planning in two month cycles dependent of finance markets and sporadically hedging derivatives on bulk stock, on behalf of one special client. Herewith, the introduction of an independent Wealth Manager creaming off 2.5% off the administration act and subsequent profit-making transaction (s).
Private wealth management is delivered to high-net-worth investors. Generally this includes advice on the use of various estate planning vehicles, business-succession or stock-option planning, and the occasional use of hedging derivatives for large blocks of stock. This is how it works : comprehending the top twenty risers was outlandishly logical and easy on January 22nd 2018. How? By searching out the days of the month / and ubitiqious paydays and affiliating the data by lining up the number of best deals on the market. On January 22nd going into the 23rd 'EasyJet plc' share price rose by 7.82%, BAE Systems plc rose by 3% and IAF rose by 3%. Two out of three consumer market orientated based and the other politically motivated in regards to MoD funding for contractors. A boost for companies like BAE Systems plc in light of the Carillion fiasco; indeed, a comedy of errors showing the absolute incompetence of rigging up billions of UK taxpayers' money against a failed conglomerate. Every Wealth Manager knew its downfall was impending, the sickening thing was it was reported a plc share rise, prior to the reported demise... this is standard on the floors of stock markets, I call it levering the inevitable. What should irk the public is the irony of a government gaining 50K from Carillion's collapse, identifies the delusional government's position, duly because it went off the bewildering gauge ---- for the hedged deal left a blackhole of 3 - 4 million now to be propped up by the guarantor: i.e. the taxpayer.
Lastly, stay up to date with the 'Latest News' -- just minutes ago an alert has hit the cyberspace airwaves that trust in social media falls sharply worldwide - possibly fake news! In response, expect a reactive spike of 0.6% drop in Facebook's share price tomorrow; check it out. Technology firms as a rule are buoyant in regards to stability for the demand is infinite at present, until a social media fake bubble bursts or a North Korean cyber attack partly disables Zuckerberg's elaborate messaging service equating to a lenghily disruption. Nevertheless, the tech-social-platform is an ideal starting point for a Wealth Manager. Prior to commencing your new career, checkout the Marshall Island's Tax position, I was beyond euphoric when I read it, couldn't put the document down for a week. Far better than 'Brideshead Revisited.' Enjoy - Money never sleeps, pal.
Comments
Post a Comment