Piranha - a suitably apt name for an uncaring DWP |
There’s a Tory regime dismantling human integrity at play under
the lariat of the DWP, overtly this undermines humanity and creates a hostile
environment – no need for the inverted comma grammar it’s now part of the DWP drip,
drip mantra of social cleansing. There
are an infinite number of examples -- you can also call it a culture of indifference
and this isn’t new.
Our UK society is unfortunately being conditioned in
believing this is the norm too and this is why the Nation requires a Social
Program to correct these illogical imbalances; ultimately, why too many benefit
claimants do not complain or even know much of what the DWP do themselves
defies the ECHR ---- inadvertently this has triggered the United Nations (UN) to
internally investigate UK paucity, the first time ever to a developed G7 Nation.
What does this mean?
Well, HM Governance will directly come under fire for a crime against humanity
and this is something Jeremy Corbyn the Leader of HM Opposition vouches; –
including previous administrations and rightly so. Y’see; for a start, mainland
Europe don’t do zero-hour-contract of the term it’s illegal and yet our UK
administration applauds it, yet the scheme locks millions into poverty,
unreliable working practices and security… for proof: food bank numbers are
rocketing. Collectively these inhumane policies are leaving the property
available for only one demographic, i.e. individuals with vocational security.
Altogether it breaches the ECHR and on a daily basis the UK is removing itself
from the EU safety net, via Brexit.
Extensive
sources have identified one part of the problem and this is private agencies
hoovering claimants up from Job Centre
Plus in the UK and merely offering them a life of fiscal insecurity: namely
zero-hour-contracts. Worse still, the companies involved are not bona fide
recruitment agencies either; meaning they’ve nothing on their books to clarify
anyone a secure income. The culture of
indifference at the echelon of power rearranges our common sense of the premise
the DWP offer contracts to private firms myopic enough to trade unlawfully
under the umbrella of the Public Sector. This acclaim isn’t just wrong it is
endangering the life chances of the vulnerable in society, namely children.
What I’ve uncovered identifies seismic breaches of trust and
outlandish incompetence within the DWP and has offered lambs to the slaughter for
example making promises they cannot possibly keep, nor able to via law. You may
be aware of the falsifications of data protections that job seekers are not
bound to, duly for this demographic are totally disregarded, I know this
through observing recruitment procedures and asking questions… it differs
greatly if you openly opt to go to a recruitment agency of your own accord. This is how DWP do it; the derivative is Job Planning through the DWP; by default
the procedure removes data-protection and deflects responsibility of such
claims in its entirety. So, recruitment firms are able to gather data-profiling
on what the receiver believes to be salient content -- nothing can be further
from the truth.
To rub salt into the wound, the DWP pressurizes individuals
into subscribing to ineffectual practices that leads them onto a road to ruin;
including zero security and debt issues. Why homeless is on the rise and
unemployment figures don’t tally up for the unspoken term: social cleansing hides the reality. A decade ago, it wasn’t
obvious; today authoritarians are getting too conceited and making colossal
societal gaffes. Again for verification,
look how the gig economy and the indigent have no demographic entity,
whatsoever, they just don’t configure under the DWP’s comprehension. All
statistics are fudged under a propagandist operator.
Noam Chomsky wisely stated that; speaking truth to power is overrated and I can verify this because
power knows the truth already and spends a great deal of time suppressing,
limiting or distorting it. There’s scope for the Nation to instruct the
powerless, indeed, this is the motivation behind the unscrupulous performances
I unravel. An ‘enterprise’ that fits
the devious mould to put it politely is: ‘First Class Education Ltd.’ So-called
teaching consultants have been on a vast tour of Job Centre Plus venues to sign
up anyone onto their teaching supply agency, when I refer to teaching
consultants they’re not really, one of them is called Charlie Sunshine, whom
came down from the last student shower last year. She has no actual teaching
experience whatsoever and yet First Class Education Ltd boasts of ‘We use our expertise and understanding of the teaching supply arena to help
schools from Nurseries to Post Compulsory Education and SEN.’
Don’t the DWP check the private sector’s professionalism /
credentials before allowing non-consultants to target the cash-strapped needy?
What struck a damning blow for me was ‘First Class Education Ltd’ isn’t a
supply teacher agency at all, for they claim to just want applicants,
regardless of teaching experience. In their literature they specified a
concerning term, it was ‘new’ – notably new to the education world; meaning they’re
content to take on anyone who’ve never taught; what about the sickos who just
like being around children? Reassuringly, the agency ensures that a consultant
will be able to guide ‘teachers.’ The problem is… these non-consultants such as
Charlie Sunshine aren’t teaching consultants just as the Job Centre Plus
candidates assigned to the fiasco aren’t mainly ex-teachers and cannot be
called teachers. To point out the discrepancy more so – ‘First Class Education
Ltd’ haven’t published any educative establishments they supply to; instead,
they embrace a nebulous area; – no specifics it’s called London.
Unfortunately the delusions and non-entities don’t stop there; the
main ‘Key Team Member’ is not part of ‘First Class Education Ltd’ – she’s
invisible on the website and plays no role in London’s operations. Her name is
Jocelyn Dillamore, presumably she owns the supply teaching agency from Chester,
namely Yew Tree Avenue, hasn’t she
heard of Operation Youtree? Of
course there’s no harm in being elsewhere when you own the business but it’s
particularly strange Mrs Dillamore doesn’t feature as a Key Team Member
considering her position.
The crucial aspect of a recruitment agency is being registered to
vet everyone who is on agencies books, especially for teaching across the age
spectrum. Otherwise it’ll be open to abuse and our authorities don’t allow
individuals to do Standard or Enhance checks themselves. The only access an
individual has is a basic disclosure of convictions, for ordinary employment
i.e. a bricklayer a generic concept is all that’s required why basic DBS
vetting is available for employers; to qualify for an Enhanced check for
example putting in front a vulnerable child a ‘new teacher;’ agencies require
organizations to register with the DBS as an umbrella body ‘First Class
Education Ltd’ is therefore trading in the education sector illegally. Below is evidence
of a search that came up with ‘0 Results.’
Yet on their website observers will read: ‘At First Class Education
we endeavour to find you the best local supply teaching candidates through our
stringent vetting procedures. These comply with all requirements of the
Department for Education for teaching supply agencies… ‘When asked about their
stringent vetting procedures, again they didn’t respond; equating to ‘0
Results.’
This is one example of a seismic malpractice, how many are out there which puts our
children in jeopardy daily? Those trading illegally maybe oblivious, alas this
doesn’t aid the vulnerable who have no choice but to toe-the-DWP-line of dereliction; alas their contractual obligations to protect families are
breached incessantly under the abject failure to act on warnings thanks to ‘Operation Yewtree’ – devised to arm a
contractual code of conduct to the DWP to work to… this has been totally flouted.
For those who’ve children, HM Government is complicit in asking businesses to
supply ‘practically anyone’ to
educative establishments unchecked and automatically this negligence breaches
the UNCRC -- a human right treaty which protects the rights of individuals less
than eighteen years of age; ultimately, this will come out in the UN report.
Comments
Post a Comment