How the DWP Jeopardizes Your Child's Future

Piranha  - a suitably apt name for an uncaring DWP

There’s a Tory regime dismantling human integrity at play under the lariat of the DWP, overtly this undermines humanity and creates a hostile environment – no need for the inverted comma grammar it’s now part of the DWP drip, drip mantra of social cleansing. There are an infinite number of examples -- you can also call it a culture of indifference and this isn’t new.

Our UK society is unfortunately being conditioned in believing this is the norm too and this is why the Nation requires a Social Program to correct these illogical imbalances; ultimately, why too many benefit claimants do not complain or even know much of what the DWP do themselves defies the ECHR ---- inadvertently this has triggered the United Nations (UN) to internally investigate UK paucity, the first time ever to a developed G7 Nation.

What does this mean? Well, HM Governance will directly come under fire for a crime against humanity and this is something Jeremy Corbyn the Leader of HM Opposition vouches; – including previous administrations and rightly so. Y’see; for a start, mainland Europe don’t do zero-hour-contract of the term it’s illegal and yet our UK administration applauds it, yet the scheme locks millions into poverty, unreliable working practices and security… for proof: food bank numbers are rocketing. Collectively these inhumane policies are leaving the property available for only one demographic, i.e. individuals with vocational security. Altogether it breaches the ECHR and on a daily basis the UK is removing itself from the EU safety net, via Brexit. 

Extensive sources have identified one part of the problem and this is private agencies hoovering claimants up from Job Centre Plus in the UK and merely offering them a life of fiscal insecurity: namely zero-hour-contracts. Worse still, the companies involved are not bona fide recruitment agencies either; meaning they’ve nothing on their books to clarify anyone a secure income.  The culture of indifference at the echelon of power rearranges our common sense of the premise the DWP offer contracts to private firms myopic enough to trade unlawfully under the umbrella of the Public Sector. This acclaim isn’t just wrong it is endangering the life chances of the vulnerable in society, namely children.

What I’ve uncovered identifies seismic breaches of trust and outlandish incompetence within the DWP and has offered lambs to the slaughter for example making promises they cannot possibly keep, nor able to via law. You may be aware of the falsifications of data protections that job seekers are not bound to, duly for this demographic are totally disregarded, I know this through observing recruitment procedures and asking questions… it differs greatly if you openly opt to go to a recruitment agency of your own accord.  This is how DWP do it; the derivative is Job Planning through the DWP; by default the procedure removes data-protection and deflects responsibility of such claims in its entirety. So, recruitment firms are able to gather data-profiling on what the receiver believes to be salient content -- nothing can be further from the truth.

To rub salt into the wound, the DWP pressurizes individuals into subscribing to ineffectual practices that leads them onto a road to ruin; including zero security and debt issues. Why homeless is on the rise and unemployment figures don’t tally up for the unspoken term: social cleansing hides the reality. A decade ago, it wasn’t obvious; today authoritarians are getting too conceited and making colossal societal gaffes.  Again for verification, look how the gig economy and the indigent have no demographic entity, whatsoever, they just don’t configure under the DWP’s comprehension. All statistics are fudged under a propagandist operator.

Noam Chomsky wisely stated that; speaking truth to power is overrated and I can verify this because power knows the truth already and spends a great deal of time suppressing, limiting or distorting it. There’s scope for the Nation to instruct the powerless, indeed, this is the motivation behind the unscrupulous performances I unravel. An ‘enterprise’ that fits the devious mould to put it politely is: ‘First Class Education Ltd.’ So-called teaching consultants have been on a vast tour of Job Centre Plus venues to sign up anyone onto their teaching supply agency, when I refer to teaching consultants they’re not really, one of them is called Charlie Sunshine, whom came down from the last student shower last year. She has no actual teaching experience whatsoever and yet First Class Education Ltd boasts of ‘We use our expertise and understanding of the teaching supply arena to help schools from Nurseries to Post Compulsory Education and SEN.’

Don’t the DWP check the private sector’s professionalism / credentials before allowing non-consultants to target the cash-strapped needy? What struck a damning blow for me was ‘First Class Education Ltd’ isn’t a supply teacher agency at all, for they claim to just want applicants, regardless of teaching experience. In their literature they specified a concerning term, it was ‘new’ – notably new to the education world; meaning they’re content to take on anyone who’ve never taught; what about the sickos who just like being around children? Reassuringly, the agency ensures that a consultant will be able to guide ‘teachers.’ The problem is… these non-consultants such as Charlie Sunshine aren’t teaching consultants just as the Job Centre Plus candidates assigned to the fiasco aren’t mainly ex-teachers and cannot be called teachers. To point out the discrepancy more so – ‘First Class Education Ltd’ haven’t published any educative establishments they supply to; instead, they embrace a nebulous area; – no specifics it’s called London.

Unfortunately the delusions and non-entities don’t stop there; the main ‘Key Team Member’ is not part of ‘First Class Education Ltd’ – she’s invisible on the website and plays no role in London’s operations. Her name is Jocelyn Dillamore, presumably she owns the supply teaching agency from Chester, namely Yew Tree Avenue, hasn’t she heard of Operation Youtree? Of course there’s no harm in being elsewhere when you own the business but it’s particularly strange Mrs Dillamore doesn’t feature as a Key Team Member considering her position.

The crucial aspect of a recruitment agency is being registered to vet everyone who is on agencies books, especially for teaching across the age spectrum. Otherwise it’ll be open to abuse and our authorities don’t allow individuals to do Standard or Enhance checks themselves. The only access an individual has is a basic disclosure of convictions, for ordinary employment i.e. a bricklayer a generic concept is all that’s required why basic DBS vetting is available for employers; to qualify for an Enhanced check for example putting in front a vulnerable child a ‘new teacher;’ agencies require organizations to register with the DBS as an umbrella body ‘First Class Education Ltd’ is therefore trading in the education sector illegally. Below is evidence of a search that came up with ‘0 Results.’




  
Yet on their website observers will read:  At First Class Education we endeavour to find you the best local supply teaching candidates through our stringent vetting procedures. These comply with all requirements of the Department for Education for teaching supply agencies… ‘When asked about their stringent vetting procedures, again they didn’t respond; equating to ‘0 Results.’

This is one example of a seismic malpractice, how many are out there which puts our children in jeopardy daily? Those trading illegally maybe oblivious, alas this doesn’t aid the vulnerable who have no choice but to toe-the-DWP-line of dereliction; alas their contractual obligations to protect families are breached incessantly under the abject failure to act on warnings thanks to ‘Operation Yewtree’ – devised to arm a contractual code of conduct to the DWP to work to… this has been totally flouted. For those who’ve children, HM Government is complicit in asking businesses to supply ‘practically anyone’ to educative establishments unchecked and automatically this negligence breaches the UNCRC -- a human right treaty which protects the rights of individuals less than eighteen years of age; ultimately, this will come out in the UN report.

Comments