‘Beggars can’t be choosers’ and this aged
social indoctrination reside in all actions affiliated to the Department of
Work and Pensions – the idiom is so rooted in our psyche readers may stick firm
to the adage and agree to the sentience. However, the down trodden and
vulnerable in society have been mistreated indefinitely because the role of
welfare is not remotely welfare, the concept of welfare has changed
unrecognisably, duly because anyone on the benefit system is willfully engaged
in government orientated pilot schemes without their knowledge - the system is
taking advantage of their impoverish scenario and worse still there’s a
contagion of DWP blackmail tactics to
make claimants comply with such schemes. Under the terms of human rights and
governmental step by step legal clauses via HMG the claimant is unaware of
their right to renegade in taking part in voluntary sector placements.
Sources going back
four years have stipulated the misdirection the so-called system has
transgressed to stroke enrolled into -- and still benefit claimants are
deceived by believing the DWP are devising platforms and networks to improve
their life status. Ultimately a breach of trust and remarkably the Charity
Commission today are discombobulated over their role for benefit claimants.
There’s no realisation to an individual’s situation especially those who’re unable
to navigate through the various rules. Dialogue from certain parties announces the
system is too complicated to do a well-being assessment independently. Indeed,
departments don’t communicate cohesively and yet the taskmaster approach is
imbalanced and tyrannical on claimants. The dysfunction or belief-system every
job-seeker is with full access to the internet is astounding – the attitudes
that greet the vulnerable require disciplinary actions or at least undertaken a
social-work qualification to quantify a recognition of what a vulnerable status
entails.
Instead there’s a
work program common denominator throughout the DWP and job-centres in the UK to
adjudicate goodwill as a means of guaranteeing your benefit. In other terms, working
in the voluntary sector, for a ‘living
crust’ – profoundly this wasn’t what the pilot scheme is about. The primary point of the scheme was to offer
a claimant an ‘Opt-In’ clause to
voluntarily work for one of UK’s 167k charities. Only 20% of charities have
registered staff members, volunteers are taken on trust and annually have no
bona fide advisers from external sources; this leaves the Sector practically obsolete
of in-house regulative agendas such as overlooking the DWP’s ‘pilot scheme’. Indirectly, Helen
Stephenson who is the CEO of the Charity Commission exposed the reality of
being forced down the ineffectual rabbit hole by the DWP in a statement within
a year of Stephenson’s appointment.
Austerity
directives from 2011 to the mauling of the Public Accounts Committee several
years later enabled DWP strategists to commence with their loosely termed work
program platform, and there we have it - Central Governance advocating the
Charity Commission a nineteenth century labour endorsed incentive. For the
historians among you the DWP are content to imitate the criminality of the
1870s, whereby convicts were leased out to private firms for no pay. Due to no
regulative measures the conditions they enslaved in defied logic. Lack of heed
or instruction from the law enforcers caused immeasurable pain and suffering.
Entrapped in a heinous system; but hey they were convicts, surely they deserved
it. Already Tory MP David Gaulke has implemented the concept as a plausible
option to fill in the gaps in UK’s labour markets post-Brexit. Catering, construction
and agriculture are the three areas of prisoner integrated ‘employment’ which’ll
be an opportunity for employers and inmates. Sounds reasonable till you’ll
denote no remuneration is planned and simulates the DWP ‘pilot scheme’ with the Charitable Sector - all possible due to the
invalid ECHR. Indeed, slave labour sits ominously under protectionism, because Brexit
means the UK is leaving the ECJ, equating to reformed ‘human rights.’
Internal
malpractice are rife, and prejudices against benefit claimants are abundant and
mistreated as if they’re convicts – once inmates enter the workplace after
Brexit, self-orchestrated by governmental chaos, the scheme comparatives will
stun the wider public, and hopefully not into relative compliance. Benefit claimants
and convicts bulldozed into a slave labour system is an attack on their dignity
and rights as human beings; enforced into wage slavery no real difference to chattel
slavery. Today, money is a new form of servitude and is only distinguishable
from old values by the de facto it is impersonal --- zero human relation
between master and slave. Of course we do have clarity of rules and regulation
in the 21 C, not that you’ll know.
Work advisers
breach the DWP and Charity Commission code of conduct in regards to checking up
on whether the benefit claimant is voluntarily helping a charity. Therefore, making
it conditional on receiving benefits – in reality the government’s official
documentation clearly states: No, the benefit claimant has chosen to volunteer
and has a separate relationship with the charity and any other organizations
including the DWP. Notably, work advisers are not bound to by duty to approach
a voluntary centre to check up on a claimant - the illegality is confirmed if an
inspection hasn’t been warranted.
Right from the off
there were discrepancies surrounding the DWP / Charity Commission pilot scheme.
Here are the main ones. 1) Timeline: work
advisers are unaware of when the pilot scheme finishes or even if it ever
started. Suffice to say, the pilot scheme now is an identifiable work program.
2) National Stage: over seven years ago a panel raised major cohesive concerns
about the pilot scheme – but was ignored by the DWP. Diplomatically, the
Commission announced they were struggling to make a case to government due to
financial and regulative strangulation.
All part of the
tyrannical itinerary of Central Government aimed at the susceptible in society.
Comments
Post a Comment