"Men fight and
lose the battle, and the thing that they fought for comes about in spite of
defeat, and when it comes it turns out not to be what they meant, and other men
have to fight what they meant under another name." William Morris
On a wet weekend
looking hirsute and weary seven and a half years ago, I was approached by
a young man on a London street who asked me a question: 'Is life a game?'
I hadn't a raincoat and I was progressively getting sodden. The man got out of
his bag a waterproof and offered me it, I could have it... I politely declined.
I was offered a hot meal... I politely declined. I was shocked how
accommodating he was and he enjoyed doing the grand gestures, 'love thy
brother' he said with a glow... 'we are all brothers' - I played along
with his 'life is a game' idiom for a while, he had a collection box and
allegedly from a charitable organization; he was joined by his 'brothers'.
The
most unnerving moment for a non-Moslem was how they spoke in parables in unison
with an steely assurance etched on their faces. Debating, 'Is life a game?'
wasn't their objective at all, it was purely a recruitment program. As the comradeship
was apparent with the brothers and the circled praying commenced, I made my
excuses and left. My exchange with them lasted for over an hour, it flew by,
and I knew after thirty minutes they could see I had no faith. My opinion of
suchlike changed dramatically overnight, all part of my polemic trait; in
search for the truth - just like Richard Dawkins I fidget for justices and
truths. To think the ideological malevolence resides in the regions of the
Middle East and just requires bombing is an incredulous qualm… the pious condition
is universal. I’m referring to the Lee Rigby beheading in Woolwich, a
suicide bomber in Beijing, the Boston marathon bomber, a pubescent Pakistani
girl with a slug in her head, because she wanted to be educated - and the
terror in a shopping mall in Nairobi, as well as Beirut and the Paris Attacks 'in
the name of Islam;' all of them have installed an urgency within me for
deeper clarity, to attempt to rationalize it with why, etc - has concave media
reports substantially; you can’t rationalize the irrational. I feel nauseous knowing the barbaric ethnic
cleansing of the Yazidis tribe on the mountain of Shingal – the sub beings’
barbaric dogmas are of a biblical magnitude, ‘mimicking deism to a tee.’ The
Yazidis’s fertile women and girls are their sex slaves beyond orthodox
comprehension, grimly abused for procreation, namely tomorrow's child suicide
bombers; their elders / male protectors wiped off the face of the earth.
"We cannot stop
lone wolves"
blurts out counterterrorism chiefs...
the problem is, they're not 'lone' they're equipped, got the arsenal,
the suicide vest, and avidly part of cell network - yes, the deflection of responsibility is
bewildering, counter terror chiefs usually are in lock-down on bureaucratic
terror laws; err, not exactly watertight ones either, when it comes to human
right acts; why human right reforms have to be realigned to the criminality
itself... for example those who align themselves to supernaturalism / deism and
engage in such activity that exposes a pious alliance to the extreme, their
entity enters the 'sub being right' for those who've no human compassion -
altogether this derails any human right. Overall, this'll unclog the
complexities of human right entitlement (s) because at present home-grown
terrorists / inciters can walk our unbiased, innocent streets without heed
having already been battle-hardened in Syrian warfare, at best a few have
security tags or curfews - this lackadaisical disregard to a nation's security
smells of the condition profound 'political correctness' - where was the
'PC' brigade when jihadis stormed Le Bataclan and massacred 89 and
sprayed restaurants and bars with slugs; resulting in 130 innocent dead, 352
innocent injured? Notably, one suicide bomber was a Syrian refugee seeking
asylum. What should be tagged onto the 'sub being entity' is the 12th century
act of treason. This is to be affiliated to the home-grown terrorist; such acts
should be fast-tracked / implemented across the EU and the West: adhering too:
scriptures ideologies deserve (non human right); hence, only archaic treatment.
‘Islamophobia’ is not a valid word.
Much talk of this word has been infiltrated within our consciousness from the
delusional and socially inept. Phobias are imaginary, the Paris attacks
weren’t imaginary – alas, there is an objective historical factor here that
radical Islam’s myriad facets are in advancement of the ‘infidel’ world. Wake
up and smell the pungent scent of deceit. The West wont resolve this
conundrum of ‘belief systems’ of varying proportions of malevolence, why
decades of warfare has failed with disparaging and dire consequences. Warfare
is their currency; it’s what Daesh thrives on. To try and eliminate it via
weaponry only inflames the vehement towards the ‘infidel’, herewith puts insurmountable
strain on our fragile democracies; due to marginalizing the Moslems;
regretfully, we’ve never mastered the art of reasoning; because our own deistic
reasoning is beyond flawed; so we choose bellicose mantra whenever trepidation
strikes. The free world and the non-free world have no common ground. However,
we can embark on tying up lose ends by charging Tony Blair and George W Bush
for war crimes; both devout Christians can affectively give up their futures
for the cause of opening up ‘pathways to redemption.’ I say this; the real ‘Chilcot Report’ will be a waste of seven years. There are
always titanic vacuum (s) when you remove dictators within these regions; to
keep the ‘sub beings’ in check. Daesh has been active since 1999; about during
the dictatorship of Saddam Hussein in Iraq; why I was against the UK’s Coalition
vote to go hell-bent into President Bashar al-Assad’s army several years
ago. David Cameron opted in! It would’ve been apocalyptic gaffe if the vote
went twenty votes the other way; our foreign policy would be nonredeemable,
thus, the UK still in an unprecedented recession – furthermore, futile to Paris
in our solidarity at present.
For answers, the
Koran / Qu’ran lays down the foundation to situ non-Moslems are not
attentive of. Air-strikes and troop deployments come with wishful thinking,
finger-crossing at sardonic levels rather than compliant to a coherent
stratagem; yet thus most palpable is a breakdown in recognizing radical Islam
ambition. This isn’t because of a lack of intellect via misinformation; no,
this is how Moslems operate, they clandestinely have cards close to their
chests – any questioning in a free world equates too…walking on egg-shells.
At this point, I’m going to reference Tom Holland a Historian and Scholar, for he
identifies the fundamental aspect of today’s Islam: “As far back as the 13th
century, a scholar based in Damascus by the name of Ibn Taymiyya proposed that
the surest way to know God’s purpose was to study the practices of the first
three generations of Muslims: the “forebears”, or “Salafs”. Reports of what
Muhammad and his earliest followers had done, so he argued, should always trump
subsequent tradition.” Salafist Moslems are what’s ubiquitous today, their
literalism is renowned ‘avec’ the Paris terrorists. In reality, what I
don’t convey is the politics involved with Islam, contemporary leaders of Islam
have openly condemned the Paris attacks but have a tendency to veil empathy
with political rhetoric. Conventional politics don’t amalgamate with belief
systems.
What really is
required is not military action but data, intelligence and solidarity in the
free world. By carrying on as we are is the best weapon of defiance, it
outweighs firepower and belligerent action. Every day I observe the travesty,
what our deistic forefathers left behind, chaos, irrationalism, and inane
decisions from our law-makers brought on by the ill-minds of ‘sub beings.’ No
modern intellectual has faith; because of events in Paris and all across the
world happens; remember; the divine omnipotence knows all what we are and
what’s to come - due to this, rational thinkers should disenfranchise to
have a free world and for once put humankind first. Daydream-y discourse eh! In
truth, we’ve not evolved in this way for millennia’s – leaders / extremists get
carried away by chemicals of empowerment to feed to their imagined public
demand (for whatever cause). Machiavellianism rules over our leaders in
response to a calamity, their language spearheads terms of doing the impossible
with might and fight. All I want to know is who is irrational and to what
level, to safeguard a nation? Simple brain-scans are far cheaper option than
deploying warfare. In the aftermath of the Paris atrocities I was not remotely
surprised at Tariq Ramadan politicizing his piety. You can understand why
non-Moslems don’t engage, let alone wish to understand.
Terrorism is, in the
first instance, aimed at showing defiance, exacting revenge and demonstrating
strength. But, to be truly successful, it needs to provoke a poorly considered
overreaction by those targeted. This has always been true. The greatest success
of the 9/11 hijackers was not destroying the World Trade Center, but tempting
the West to launch into war after war… and making mistake after mistake. I
advise, you walk away and educate yourself.
Comments
Post a Comment