Regimental
solitude does nothing to safeguard a nation’s economic civility in the long
term, I’ll go further – absolute solitude
has the capacity to be our greater ill once the corona pandemic subsides or
goes into practicable levels. What will
our working age civilization go back to? At present, no, High Office
official is in preparation for a time whereby a slice of normal working life
could possibly commence. This could evolve to be a far greater concern than being
slow off the blocks than the Covid-19 outbreak itself.
Grievously,
our incapacitated incumbent is going from bubble to bubble from solitude slogan
to another without identifying with the community at large; eventually solitude
will feel less like a proper citizen and become permanently institutionalized
in their own self-induce coma (s). They’ll forget all of the freedoms we once
had and be outlandishly submissive; ideal for a regime that abides by social
distancing and thus is able to walk the streets unafraid of law enforcement
reprimands. Why stricter insular measures after 13/04/20 requires a wide girth,
instead a mild, balanced approach with clarity and comprehensive reasoning
needs a decent airing - done so, with authoritarian unison which regretfully
has socially gone erroneous since the initial lock-down in 3/20.
Individually,
our journey onto life’s insular survival will encounter great discomforts –
alas, it’s worth considering that our sacrifices in isolation will be fruitful;
for what we know is the demands that the hard work of love makes on our development
are larger than life, and as beginners we are no match for this imperceptible situation.
But if we can hold out and take this indescribable burden stroke apprenticeship
and learn something of ourselves, rather than losing ourselves in all the
trivia of immediate self-rewards, frivolous games of breaching social
distancing which threatens our existence -- then perhaps, a small advantage and
relief will commence before too long. Undoubtedly, the liberation will mean a
great deal – of course to get to this point, our stalled livelihoods will have
to be able to function efficiently from the get-go. Yet I feel anxious in how
this pandemic approach is unraveling.
Notably,
the exit strategy is abstruse, garnering the impression that the lock-down had been
implemented practically in a magician’s hat, with the daily observers at the
press conferences expecting 1st Minister Dominic Raab or even the
crooked PM, Boris Johnson to pull a rabbit out of the hat. For me, the lack of
an open-policy or not even a notion of an exit strategy is detriment to societal functions; why it doesn’t tally up is in the
acknowledgement that behind the ‘socio-political machination scene,’ policy
makers incessantly put a price of human life while deciding on national health
resources. Thus, an unsavoury pill to stomach during the corona era which has
brought upon a 9% increase of national deaths in 3/20 going by average death
rates in the last five years. However invisible death rates will soar if the
lock-down encroaches on personal finances over a durable period, especially in
the low paid and the young dependent on zero hour contract work.
Under
the FOI, I’ve acknowledged in my solitude evidence from the Office of National
Statistics that medical practitioners are required to certify causes of death
to the best of their knowledge and most remarkably…‘Belief.’ This equates that
Covid-19 certified cause of death is government policy led, and was obviously updated
since corona virus became apparent in the UK; so now the medical practitioners are
coerced into following a set agenda. For example, if before death the patient
had Covid-19 symptoms prior to their sad demise it would be satisfactory to give corona virus as the
reason. In retrospect, this tick the
right box approach is audaciously generic. Worst still, there’s no need for
a corona swab result, to clarify cause of death, why the UK isn’t urgently Covid testing compared to Germany even
though the Health Secretary, Matt Hancock is setting up incongruous targets
that won’t be met, especially outside hospitals… meaning that pod testing sites
are fruitless, specifically for the sick, elderly and vulnerable who’re locked
away in virus laden care homes and not forgetting those invisible numbers
self-isolating. Therefore, any scripted statistics pushed through into our
homes is nonsensical; they’re a mere tip of the iceberg of the corona
devastation - virally and economically.
To not
lay any dehumanized blame on our incumbent won’t serve the UK well, because
there’re laws against the cause of death management under the term of a ‘medical practitioner’s so-called cause of
death belief.’ One such decree came directly from ‘The Shipman Inquiry;’ what
positively manifested from the Inquiry was it enabled death certification scrutiny,
observations over patterns of mortality and agencies were able to decipher
nebulous causes of death. Although, I fear much of this normal practice in the
corona-era will be gone, along with many professions and skills - cast aside as
corona collateral. If only we could safeguard our macroeconomic survival by adapting
to a ‘Jenga-style,’ balanced tactic?
Of
course, I’m kidding myself, why my solitude sleep pattern is up the creek
without a paddle. HMG didn’t evaluate the threat, let alone what it could do to
cities with high population densities. My uneasiness is due to Westminster
insiders proclaiming that the cogs didn’t start turning quick enough, it was as
if they didn’t compute the scale; comments such as: ‘top influencers holding the reins were too blasé’. COBRA meets
were far from a well-oiled machine, nothing like the coordinated exercises that
follows from a terror attack. The Prime Minister looked out of control and
those present in meetings were astonished at the lack of corona virus intelligence
from affected areas overseas. None of them have that Churchill spirit of what’s required in a crisis,
why there’s seriously gaping holes in the corona-era fiscal formula.
Chancellor
of the Exchequer, Rishi Sunak’s £350 billion fiscal stimulus again props up the
banks, rather than businesses, I ascertain mistakes of 2007 – 09 not learnt. On
this premise, to put it bluntly, I lean towards the unlikely ilk of Professor
Thomas and Toby Young’s collective prose that if the GDP shrinks by 6.4% as a result of national unproductivity, our quality
of life will suffer substantially and more lives will be lost than actually saved.
The only way out of this enforced fiscal restraint scenario is to change the global capitalistic model, via conglomerate measures globally, to cushion the inevitable pain for humanity -- embark
on a new Trade Act specially devised for global pandemics - because so far
there’s only a comatose effect occurring during our solitude period and that’s
not entirely everything… stock markets still function and short-selling hasn’t
been suspended -- why?
Sadly, ultra-avarice
people govern these sectors and are capitalising on death, nothing new there.
Comments
Post a Comment