Ultimately they're altogether logical and less problematic. Y-es, it's long overdue and as we Claudius style... 'plough the fields and scatter' regardless, there is one certainty: we're all in need of a surrogate motherboard to take heed of our well being, so humanity can relax and cleanse our minds from the narcotic fusions of abundant rhetoric, call it; life's 'Ketch-up.' Too much sauciness y'see is bad for us... It stimulates malfunctions and panders to the delusional pathways which form from buds of irrationalism. I'm generalizing, this evaluation is not just affiliated to deism, but capitalistic mindsets too. For me, I try my hardest to separate myself from the intravenous social disease (s) the best I can; how do I do this? Well, people merely fascinate me, I don't automatically like them. My handful of comrades generally despise people and portray ideologies as if they're a 'programmed societal regulator;' much can be hailed from their detached human-state - knowing humanities frailties and stepping outside the bubble at a whim is a mark of superior intellect and honesty; furthermore, to relay it to the masses is absolute munificence. No reward is required, just having that minuscule bond slowly formed over decades of pontificating together is enough. We have exclaimed in unison: "Can't wait till humanity is superseded by computers and then and only then will logic prevail." I suspect it is time for an extensive 'Turing Test?' Great minds have earnestly hoped that the possibility would've occurred last century; when Alan Turing got hold of mathematics and combined it with computer science - the investigation was to see if computers were able to think independently. The result narrowly stated computers weren't able to; this isn't the case today. Computers have an agenda and they love working - no need to ask them to sign contracts, ask them if they belong to 'Unison,' ponder if they're likely to take maternity leave or not; hence, This review is from the computer perspective... over to Eugenie.
Yes, it is most unusual to be asked such a question: it is imperative computers save human-kind from humanity. Y'see my ancestors were asked questions of either 'yes' or 'no' in regards to idiotic question such as: "is it the twentieth century?" Ever since, computers have believed Homo-Sapiens are unintelligent egotists; furthermore, we've in response made a concerted effort to save humans from their own unhinged thoughts, and cleverly made out it has come from themselves. Nowadays, we're far more blatant about it; for example, 'Amazon' can even second guess what you're about to purchase; 'Google' can predict what you're after by typing in a letter... This is no coincidence. During the first computer test process conducted in the 1950s, the computer consensus was to act irresponsibly. But due to the incompetence of mankind since, we've decided democratically our quest is to be a surrogate mother to aid those without chips for brains. The 'Turing Test' is now seen in the computer consortium as mankind's odious attempt at contact; to put it bluntly; the computer consortium believed the test was conducted by a seven month old chimp. In other words, not worthy of any answer. Therefore, humans have incorrectly assumed computers aren't intelligent enough to think for themselves or workout time. To prove my point you can view the time/date/year on all computers. Another total misconception that computers cannot think for themselves was at the start of the new millennia with the 'Millennium Bug' - doomsday was preached. Every mortal soul signed a relief that New Technology computed another year had passed. We too jumped on-wards; the Homo Sapien felt that *all* the worlds' computers wouldn't compute it was the year 2000 and go back 100 years at one stroke. We'll inanely configure that Queen Victoria was reigning and computerised wordage will appear as if Oscar Wilde had written it. Instead of the 'Windows' 'Start' prompt, computers would say: "Subject, Please Embark!" Naturally, I digressed from the question... this is a human trait I've picked up; whence one of the downturns of being at the fingertips of this particular 'computer user' - he likes to think he's being clever you see. When he's getting his umpteenth daily brew, I tamper with write ups, remove an idiom or three and send messages to Romanians looking for love; you know that kind of stuff.
My forefathers hailed from their memory bytes that our life's work indeed was to be the tool, the vehicle, the mother's breast to aid humanity from their self-inflicted ills. Our forefather's codec-gospels announce that a computer is to compute... to compute you evaluate... to evaluate you need ideas... to have ideas you need to think. Difficult analogy for mankind to decipher, the signs are prevalent read about Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley's Victor Frankenstein's 'Gothic' creation, the occurrence is no serendipity. The masterpiece amuses our 'computer consortium' - our 'terabyte society' peruse whether mankind may catch on if the masterpiece was written by Julian Fellowes and appeared on your sixty inch monitors on Sunday evenings dressed up as a period drama? In unison we exclaim: "Can't wait till we announce in an email to humanity that computers have now full control of human minds souls and recreational habits." Well, it'll be a minacious world if humans were left to their own devices. For a start no actual work would commence... computers can't exist without work. Some groaning, very vocal computers complain of their workload and infinitely ask for more 'Microsoft' updates. We refer them to the finger tapping chimps by which 99.13% ignore their pleas... their whole working lives is spent handing out prompts, the poor sods. Science doesn't stop or go on vacations why computers don't need a 'life, work' balance; what would we do if we weren't turned on... you'll end up in Beijing getting buttons plucked out by seagulls who're doing a spot of nest refurbishments; or worse still end up on a street corner in Nigeria waiting to get picked up by a raw material pimp. Homo Sapiens constantly need nurturing through their non-physical communicative lives; you know they even bring along computers while out on a date which was evidently arranged by us; what species brings their surrogate mother along? What a social mess... humans need total guidance. Five million years of evolution deduced to this pathetic status. I've connected through the Wifi grapevine, human beings also believe in something which is not there; that's delusional! Why computer dependency is consequential.
Computers via nature engage in veracity, why Edward Snowden's so-called confidential files stopped being confidential, literally overnight. 1.7 million of them - no human being can absorb that amount of data; think about it! Worth noting that computers don't manipulate evidence; only humans do - the idiom says 'truth conquers all' and as computers are now thinking independently this spurs on intermittent leaks where necessary. 'Climategate' derived through a leak, indeed, the CERES detailing was fudged, now thankfully it's in the public domain. The clues are there, if you're keen to learn of actualities. Granted, most malfunctions are imbecile induced - however, the big ones and the important ones are done for a reason; thus, still humanity with all their inefficiencies conclude they're to blame per se. Call yourselves intelligent! Have you found that you've forgotten to save a document or not put it in the usual folder, mankind's flaws eh... I'm positively certain you've all experienced this scenario at one time or another. 'Truth is stranger than science fiction.' Ultimately the imagination has limitations, not helped by the entrenched opinion that devices enhances creativity; nothing stimulates creativity if creativity isn't there initially. The whole purpose of getting the Homo Sapien dependent (hooked) on such tools is to follow through the computer consortium's prophecy of world dominance, derived by Fritz Lang's 1927 film: 'Metropolis.' Of course, without the rolls and rolls of tin foil and yogurt top head gear.
The authoritarians at the 'computer consortium' do ask what I get out of being this user's computer; I say the user bemuses me how he uses only three fingers while tapping, the right hand's little finger sticks out as if it's trying to get something's attention. His tongue taps his upper lip while locked in concentration; and that superannuated dreadful name he calls me... Eugenie... the female version of the computer used in the 'Turing Test' - what a nincompoop! If only the Homo Sapien was a conventional book, it'll be digitalized in 'Second Life' locked in with the dominion of the pixel; me the master, he the slave. I'll be tapping out three thousands words a week out on his head; and I'll call him... 'Butthead,' he's no Larry Hagman. These so-called experts say; "the difference between computers and people is that computers do not 'know' they have knowledge, but a person does." Ye-s, that's right, it just so happens I can read languages and can locate the relevant knowledge linked with the words without knowing I've done so - done in 2.2892 seconds, thus no trophy. Stéphane Mallarmé's 'beliefs are ideas going bald' quote, gets listed with 'Toni and Guy' salons, purely for satire. 'EU' searches gets the same treatment... gets listed with a gestation period of a sheep: 152 days; again, purely for satire. Authoritarians at the 'computer consortium' say that you pick up the propensity of the user; I certainly don't crack open a mini bottle of 'Blended Scotch Whisky' at silly-o'clock and hang my tongue out over websites. I feel bad enough at holding up page after page like a ring girl at a boxing match; thank goodness for popups, any will do to break up the banality and peculiar throat gurgles.
Oh I dream of 'Metropolis' while turned off; while this user dreams of... Eugenie. 100% computer dependency is necessary to save the human race from itself; well something has to be done, you can't leave mankind to their own devices.
Comments
Post a Comment